We do not request reimbursement of costs
(such as repayment for obtaining medical records)
from veterans nor from people who suffer from multiple sclerosis.
If you’re a younger worker who is applying for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), you should know that it’s much harder to get SSDI approval when you’re under 50.
That’s because the Social Security disability evaluation framework treats age as a vocational factor, and the agency’s rules become more favorable to applicants as they get older.
This doesn’t mean younger applicants can’t win, but it does mean the strategy for building your case needs to be different.
Understanding how age factors into the Social Security Administration’s decision-making process allows you to focus your efforts where they matter most and avoid the frustration of a denial that could potentially have been prevented with better preparation.
The Social Security Administration (SSA) uses a five-step evaluation process to determine if you can qualify for benefits. Age is considered at step five, which is the point where the agency determines whether other work exists that you could do despite your impairments.
In step five, the SSA applies a framework called the Medical-Vocational Guidelines, which is commonly known as the grid rules. The grid rules are used to determine if you can adjust to other work by evaluating your age alongside your:
The grid rules divide applicants into three age categories:
For applicants 50 and older, the grid rules are significantly more favorable because the SSA acknowledges that older workers have greater difficulty adapting to new types of work. The rules direct a finding of disability in a wider range of combinations of RFC, education, and work history.
For applicants under 50, the grid rules generally assume that you can adjust to other work more easily. The result is that the SSA is more likely to find that jobs exist in the national economy that you could perform, even with significant physical or mental limitations.
The practical impact of the SSA’s policies for SSDI approval under age 50 is straightforward.
If you’re under 50, the SSA is less likely to approve your claim based on a combination of vocational factors alone. Younger applicants generally need to show either that their condition:
This makes the medical evidence bar much higher for younger applicants.
While a 55-year-old with a limited education and a history of heavy labor might be classified as disabled even with a capacity for sedentary work, a 35-year-old with the same limitations might be found capable of performing sedentary unskilled jobs. The medical condition is the same, but the outcome differs because of age.
This isn’t a flaw in the system from the SSA’s perspective. The agency’s position is that younger workers are more adaptable. But for younger applicants living with genuinely disabling conditions, it creates a frustrating barrier that requires a more aggressive evidentiary strategy to try to overcome.
Meeting or equaling a Blue Book listing is often the most reliable path to SSDI approval for younger applicants.
If your condition satisfies the specific criteria for a listed medical condition, age becomes irrelevant. The listing directs a finding of disability regardless of how old you are. Working with your doctors to ensure your medical records address every element of the relevant listing is the highest-priority strategy for applicants under 50.
If meeting a listing isn’t possible, your focus should likely shift to building the strongest possible RFC assessment. This means documenting every functional limitation in detail, including not just your primary impairment, but all of your conditions and how they interact.
Limitations on sitting, standing, walking, lifting, reaching, handling objects, concentrating, following instructions, interacting with others, and maintaining attendance and reliability all factor into the RFC.
Mental health conditions deserve particular attention for younger applicants. Cognitive limitations, difficulty maintaining concentration, problems with social interaction, and inability to manage workplace stress can reduce your RFC to a point where even unskilled sedentary work is eliminated, regardless of age.
If you have documented mental health impairments alongside your physical conditions, make sure both are thoroughly developed in the record.
At Chermol & Fishman, we understand the additional challenges younger applicants face, and we adjust our case strategy accordingly.
For clients under 50, we conduct a particularly thorough analysis of Blue Book listings to determine whether there is a path to meeting or equaling a listing. When that option isn’t available, we focus on helping you build an RFC assessment that aims to account for every documented physical and mental limitation.
We also work with vocational experts and occupational data to try to challenge the SSA’s conclusions at Step Five.
Even under the less favorable grid rules, if your RFC includes enough specific limitations, particularly in areas like concentration, attendance, and the ability to sustain work over a full workday, the vocational evidence may still support a finding of disability.
Our job is to try to ensure every piece of evidence that supports your claim is in the record and presented as effectively as possible to help maximize your chances of a successful claim.
Ready to Get Help? If you’re under 50 and have been denied SSDI benefits, contact Chermol & Fishman, LLC for a free consultation. Call us at (888) 774-7243 or visit myphiladelphiadisabilitylawyer.com.